Yesterday I interviewed at Emory for the master's program in anesthesiology. Admittedly, I haven't been to many interviews in my life, but the ones I have been to were all pretty similar. Yesterday's was a decidedly different experience. It was definitely the most interesting and, in the end, fun interview I've had. First the format was different. We had three group interviews with three different pairs of interviewers. The first was mostly standard "learn more about you" questions such as the last book I read, the most unusual thing that had happened to me, and how I would react in a given scenario (first to arrive at an accident scene). Then they asked about how Ansel Adams and Robert Frost are related. They also asked about Martha Graham, Eugene O'Neill, and Samuel Clemens. The second interview was just like a normal interview.
The third phase was what made this interview unique in my experience. From the time we walked in, the interviewers acted very intimidating, one more than the other. It was almost like a "Good Cop, Bad Cop" routine, but the good cop never did anything to help us out. It was more "Playfully Mischievous Cop, Pure Evil Cop". They asked us questions that didn't seem to have any relevance, trivia questions (of the sort encountered at the Panasonic Walt Disney World Academic Challenge rather than at a Quiz Bowl tournament for those familiar with such competitions). "What is the Fibonacci sequence?" "If I stand at the nose of a spaceship traveling at the speed of light and turn on a flashlight, what happens?" "Define treason, heathen, and cretin." If you answered correctly, they would have a more difficult follow up question, and it seemed like the goal was to get you to say "I don't know" or make something up. If you made something up, they would pick up on it immediately and ask you more about it in a way that allows you to go farther down that road eventually making yourself look like an idiot. There was no encouragement and no shortage of snide comments. My favorite from my group was "So the little that you know about it is actually zero. Well I guess that's a little." I heard from a woman in the group before mine that he had asked her a psychology question that she didn't know and he responded pretty viciously. "You're a psychology major and you don't know that?! Where do you go to school that they didn't teach you that?" I got the impression that the point of this interview was to see how well we could think and respond under stress. Everybody I talked to beforehand said that it was horrible, but I enjoyed it. My favorite question was as we were leaving. The hardcase asked everybody what his, the interviewer's, name was. He had only introduced himself as "Not Sam." The other interviewer, Sam, had referred to him by name a couple of times while we were in the room though, and he wanted to see who had picked up on it.
Like I said, this was the most interesting and fun interview I have been to. Has anybody else encountered something like this or have I just had the bad luck to meet with unimaginative people?
The third phase was what made this interview unique in my experience. From the time we walked in, the interviewers acted very intimidating, one more than the other. It was almost like a "Good Cop, Bad Cop" routine, but the good cop never did anything to help us out. It was more "Playfully Mischievous Cop, Pure Evil Cop". They asked us questions that didn't seem to have any relevance, trivia questions (of the sort encountered at the Panasonic Walt Disney World Academic Challenge rather than at a Quiz Bowl tournament for those familiar with such competitions). "What is the Fibonacci sequence?" "If I stand at the nose of a spaceship traveling at the speed of light and turn on a flashlight, what happens?" "Define treason, heathen, and cretin." If you answered correctly, they would have a more difficult follow up question, and it seemed like the goal was to get you to say "I don't know" or make something up. If you made something up, they would pick up on it immediately and ask you more about it in a way that allows you to go farther down that road eventually making yourself look like an idiot. There was no encouragement and no shortage of snide comments. My favorite from my group was "So the little that you know about it is actually zero. Well I guess that's a little." I heard from a woman in the group before mine that he had asked her a psychology question that she didn't know and he responded pretty viciously. "You're a psychology major and you don't know that?! Where do you go to school that they didn't teach you that?" I got the impression that the point of this interview was to see how well we could think and respond under stress. Everybody I talked to beforehand said that it was horrible, but I enjoyed it. My favorite question was as we were leaving. The hardcase asked everybody what his, the interviewer's, name was. He had only introduced himself as "Not Sam." The other interviewer, Sam, had referred to him by name a couple of times while we were in the room though, and he wanted to see who had picked up on it.
Like I said, this was the most interesting and fun interview I have been to. Has anybody else encountered something like this or have I just had the bad luck to meet with unimaginative people?